~~~ 𝑻𝒉𝒆 π‘Ίπ’†π’“π’Šπ’†π’” 𝒐𝒇 π‘©π’Šπ’ˆ 𝑢 ~~~𝑷𝒂𝒓𝒕 – 𝑰𝑽

Polynomial time complexity in algorithms causes tasks to become increasingly complex with each additional input, much like managing a family WhatsApp group. Joining the group is O(n), deciphering messages is O(n^2), and managing disputes is O(n^3). Nested loops and multiple operations on the entire dataset indicate polynomial time complexity, such as O(n^2) or O(n^3).

Read More ~~~ 𝑻𝒉𝒆 π‘Ίπ’†π’“π’Šπ’†π’” 𝒐𝒇 π‘©π’Šπ’ˆ 𝑢 ~~~𝑷𝒂𝒓𝒕 – 𝑰𝑽

~~~ 𝑻𝒉𝒆 π‘Ίπ’†π’“π’Šπ’†π’” 𝒐𝒇 π‘©π’Šπ’ˆ 𝑢 ~~~𝑷𝒂𝒓𝒕 – 𝑰𝑰𝑰

In a linear time scenario, the time taken to complete a task grows with the size of the input. Like avoiding pesky questions at a big family gathering, each relative must be checked before finding the relative of interest. Similarly, in algorithms, checking each element in a list one by one creates a linear relationship. As datasets grow, efficient algorithms become crucial.

Read More ~~~ 𝑻𝒉𝒆 π‘Ίπ’†π’“π’Šπ’†π’” 𝒐𝒇 π‘©π’Šπ’ˆ 𝑢 ~~~𝑷𝒂𝒓𝒕 – 𝑰𝑰𝑰

~~~ 𝑻𝒉𝒆 π‘Ίπ’†π’“π’Šπ’†π’” 𝒐𝒇 π‘©π’Šπ’ˆ 𝑢 ~~~𝑷𝒂𝒓𝒕 – 𝑰𝑰

O(logn) indicates logarithmic time complexity, where the algorithm’s efficiency grows as the problem size reduces. For instance, in a sorted list search, you progressively eliminate half the list at each step, akin to finding a word in a dictionary by halving the search space. Various examples illustrate logarithmic time complexity, emphasizing its efficiency for large datasets.

Read More ~~~ 𝑻𝒉𝒆 π‘Ίπ’†π’“π’Šπ’†π’” 𝒐𝒇 π‘©π’Šπ’ˆ 𝑢 ~~~𝑷𝒂𝒓𝒕 – 𝑰𝑰

~~~ 𝑻𝒉𝒆 π‘Ίπ’†π’“π’Šπ’†π’” 𝒐𝒇 π‘©π’Šπ’ˆ 𝑢 ~~~𝑷𝒂𝒓𝒕 – 𝑰

Big O Notation provides a way to describe how the performance of an algorithm changes with input size, offering a worst-case scenario. O(1) represents constant time, where the algorithm takes the same amount of time regardless of input size. Examples include accessing array elements by index, swapping numbers, and inserting nodes in a linked list.

Read More ~~~ 𝑻𝒉𝒆 π‘Ίπ’†π’“π’Šπ’†π’” 𝒐𝒇 π‘©π’Šπ’ˆ 𝑢 ~~~𝑷𝒂𝒓𝒕 – 𝑰